May 04, 2024
Anti
The group urged the EFCC and other anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria to “carry out meticulous investigation and subsequent prosecution of all those fingered in this high-brow corruption issue. The
The group urged the EFCC and other anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria to “carry out meticulous investigation and subsequent prosecution of all those fingered in this high-brow corruption issue.
The Centre for Anti-Corruption and Open Leadership, CACOL, has backed the Minister of State Labour and Employment, Festus Keyamo (SAN) over his call on anti-corruption agencies to arrest, interrogate and prosecute the presidential candidate of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar.
Keyamo had issued a 72-hour ultimatum to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offenses Commission (ICPC) and Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) to arrest the presidential candidate of the PDP, Atiku Abubakar.
However, the group urged the EFCC and other anti-corruption agencies in Nigeria to “carry out meticulous investigation and subsequent prosecution of all those fingered in this high-brow corruption issue, we want to make it clear that there should be maximum protection for the whistleblower, Festus Keyamo (SAN) and any other person that has to do with the issue at hand.”
The spokesperson in a letter dated January 16, signed by him, said Atiku should be arrested, interrogated and prosecuted for alleged money laundering.
In a petition to the agencies, Keyamo said the revelations of a whistleblower, Michael Achimugu implicated Atiku as siphoning public funds through proxies –“special purpose vehicles” while he was vice-president.
He asked the agencies to act on the petition or face a lawsuit.
However, a release issued by CACOL’s Director of Administration and Programmes, Tola Oresanwo, on behalf of Mr. Debo Adeniran, the Chairman of the Centre, noted that the recent revelations and allegations against the person of the PDP presidential candidate should not be swept under the carpet and should not be viewed from a political perspective.
He said; “It would be recalled that Keyamo, in a five-page petition dated Monday, January 16, 2023 to the Chairmen of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) and the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) accused the PDP candidate of four major infractions.
"Keyamo who was acting on the revelations of a whistleblower Mr. Michael Achimugu, who has provided the nation with evidence of letters of appointment by Atiku Abubakar, e-mails, documents, audio clips, sworn affidavit and his direct oral evidence as to how Atiku, during his tenure as Vice-President of Nigeria between 1999 and 2007, colluded with his then boss, ex-president Olusegun Obasanjo, to fleece the country and steal public funds using what he termed as “Special Purpose Vehicles” (SPVs).
“From all indications, we have noticed that corruption in the country is like a nexus whereby an individual connives with several others to loot the treasury. The recent revelation linking the ex-president and his then vice president, with the former governor of Plateau State, Joshua Dariye is a pointer to this fact.
"We at CACOL, as a non-partisan, civil society organization believe that the recent revelations and allegations against the person of the PDP Presidential Candidate should not be swept under the carpet and should not be viewed from a political perspective. That is why we are aligning ourselves with the moves by the Minister of State Labour and Employment, Festus Keyamo (SAN) to get to the root of this case.
“Nobody should stand in the way of Keyamo to get to the root of the matter. The revelation in the audio is damning and nobody has successfully refuted the allegations. The fact that the whistleblower came up with an affidavit is proof that he is sure of what he is saying and he is ready to stand by it. If anybody has anything against what he has said, the onus is on the person to come out and sue the whistleblower for perjury.”
View the discussion thread.